Skip to main content

Talent and / or Honesty

My Friend Shridhar in Tiruchchy told me a story. There was a King, who had no son to continue his Lineage. So, he wanted to select and adopt a boy with right qualities. He asked his minister to conduct an Intelligence test and select hundred 'Most Intelligent' boys. He went to each one of them, talked to parents about the purpose of this test. The parents were delighted about the prospects of their son becoming the Prince and King in future. The King then handed over a seed and a pot to them and asked them to grow the plant in the given pot and come to the palace a year later. All the hundred boys reported at the Palace on the appointed date. All but one had well-grown, lush green plants in the pots. The king went around and inspected the pots and plants. The King finally asked the boy with empty pot to come forward and asked him the reason. He was sad and said, "I tried my best. Changed soil a few times, watered regularly but the seed never sprouted. I merely came to say sorry and return the pot". Many in the crowd heckled him saying, "Can't even grow a plant, but aspires to become the King". The King in his announcement named this boy as his heir. All were surprised. The King said, "I had given boiled and dried seeds to all, which could never have sprouted and grown as plants".

This is the greatest dilemma for all trusts and organizations, social, political, commercial, Religious, recreational. Talent and Honesty. Can these two co-exist? Should one expect both in the personnel in-charge of an organization? If one has to make a choice 'Talent or honesty' which should he opt for? The worse situation is when persons neither skilled nor honest, capture organizations. Such persons try to purchase and enslave talent with money and hide dishonesty again with money and power.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ஜ, ஷ, ஸ, ஹ, க்ஷ, ஸ்ரீ ....

ॐ ஜ , ஷ , ஸ , ஹ , ஶ , க்ஷ , ஸ்ரீ என்ற எழுத்துக்களை வடமொழி எழுத்துக்கள் என்கிறான் ஒருவன். ஸம்ஸ்க்ருத எழுத்து என்கிறான் ஒருவன் . மூடர்கள் .  அறியாமையில் பேசுகின்றனர் . தவறான நோக்கத்துடன், நம்முள் பேதத்தை ஏற்படுத்திட எவனோ புதைத்துச் சென்ற விஷத்தை , அது விஷம் என்று கூட அறியாமல் பேசுகின்றனர் . வட என்பது திஶை . திஶைக்கு மொழி கிடையாது . (இசைக்கும் மொழி கிடையாது . கவிதைக்குதான் மொழி . தமிழிசை மன்றம் என்பதெல்லாம் அபத்தம் .) தமிழகத்திற்கு வடக்கில் பாரத தேஶத்தின் அத்தனை ப்ராந்தங்களும் (கேரளம் தவிர்த்து) உள்ளன . தெலுங்கு , மராடீ , போஜ்புரி , குஜராதீ ... அனைத்து மொழிகளும் வட திஶையில் பேசப்படும் மொழிகள் .  இவை எல்லாம் வடமொழிகள் . (கன்யாகுமரி ஆளுக்கு சென்னை பாஷை கூட வடமொழிதான்) . இந்த எல்லா மொழிகளிலும் இந்த ஶப்தங்களுக்கு எழுத்துக்கள் உண்டு .   தெலுங்கில் జ  , స  , హ .. . என்றும் ,   கன்னடத்தில்   ಜ , ಸ , ಹ , ಕ್ಷ .. என்றும் , மராடீயில் . ज , स , ह , श , क्ष,.. என்றும் குஜராதியில்     જ , સ , હા , ક્ષ  , என்றும் ,   பெங்காலியில் জ  ,   স , হা  , ক্ষ ... என்றும் ஹிந்தியில் ज , स , ह , 

Chapter X (19 - 42)

\ श्री भगवानुवाच - हन्त ते कथष्यामि दिव्या ह्यात्मविभूतय : । प्राधान्यत : कुरुश्रेष्ठ नास्त्यन्तो विस्तरस्य मे ॥ १९ ॥ Shri Bhagawan said:   I shall speak to Thee now, Oh best of the Kurus! of My Divine attributes, according to their prominence;   there is no end to the particulars of My manifestation. (X - 19) Arjuna asks for a detailed and complete elaboration on His manifestations.   Shri Krishna replies He will be brief in description.   Why?   ‘My manifestations are infinite’, says Shri Krishna.   Shri Krishna is in human form.   The Infinite Paramaatman has bound Himself in a finite Form.   A finite can not fully describe an Infinite.   The same Shri Krishna in the next chapter says, “See My Infinite Forms.   See as much as you wish”, when Arjuna expresses his desire to see His one Form.   Brief in words and Elaborate in Form.;. The discussion in the last shlokam continues here.   The listener’s ahankara tries to fathom the speaker.   The listener, Arj

Chapter IV (1 - 20)

\   ADHYAAY IV   GYANA KARMA SANYASA YOGAM Introduction This chapter named ‘Gnyana Karma Sanyasa Yog’ is a special one, as this is where Shri Krishna reveals the secrets of Avatara to Arjuna. We, as human have a natural weakness.  When a great thought is placed before us, instead of analysing the thought, understanding it and trying to put it into practise, almost all of us start worshipping the person who revealed the thought.  Worship of the Cross and the idols of Buddha can be quoted as examples.  One of the reasons for this may be that we deem him to be the originator of the thought.  Truths are eternal and can only be revealed and not invented.  You ask any educated person about ahimsa or non-violence.  You should not be surprised if he instantly come up with the answer, “Gandhi”.  You try to clarify that ‘almost two thousand years ago Shri Mahaveer based his life and religion solely on the principle of Ahimsa’ and ‘hundreds of years prior to that the Vedas, the Gi